Superlotto 6/49 statistics
Descriptive statistics of verified past draws. Nothing on this page predicts future results.
Frequency & gaps
Hot / cold
Pairs & triples
Patterns
Per-draw stats
Trend grid
Filter assistant
Backtest
Superlotto 6/49 · rules v1 50 verified draws Latest 50 verified draws Data as of Sep 29, 2026 5:15 AM Game rules pending verification Method & assumptions
- Game rules
- 6 numbers from 1–49 (version 1)
- Date span analysed
- 2026-06-04 → 2026-09-27 (Manila dates)
- Excluded
- 0 draw(s) pending verification, rejected, or under different game rules.
- Algorithm version
- a3
- Method
- Retrospective description of verified past draws under a uniform independent-draw model. It does not change the probability of any future combination.
| Set | Draws containing it | Expected (fair draw) | Ratio | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
15
25
|
5 | 0.638 | 7.84× | 2026-09-22 |
33
42
|
4 | 0.638 | 6.27× | 2026-09-15 |
42
44
|
4 | 0.638 | 6.27× | 2026-07-21 |
17
47
|
4 | 0.638 | 6.27× | 2026-09-24 |
15
37
|
4 | 0.638 | 6.27× | 2026-09-22 |
05
13
|
4 | 0.638 | 6.27× | 2026-08-11 |
02
25
|
3 | 0.638 | 4.7× | 2026-07-30 |
03
11
|
3 | 0.638 | 4.7× | 2026-08-27 |
25
44
|
3 | 0.638 | 4.7× | 2026-09-06 |
33
44
|
3 | 0.638 | 4.7× | 2026-09-20 |
08
13
|
3 | 0.638 | 4.7× | 2026-09-03 |
13
40
|
3 | 0.638 | 4.7× | 2026-08-11 |
06
16
|
3 | 0.638 | 4.7× | 2026-08-18 |
08
47
|
3 | 0.638 | 4.7× | 2026-08-20 |
02
36
|
3 | 0.638 | 4.7× | 2026-09-01 |
20
36
|
3 | 0.638 | 4.7× | 2026-08-23 |
20
26
|
3 | 0.638 | 4.7× | 2026-09-13 |
12
44
|
3 | 0.638 | 4.7× | 2026-09-20 |
25
36
|
3 | 0.638 | 4.7× | 2026-09-17 |
14
23
|
3 | 0.638 | 4.7× | 2026-09-15 |
05
22
|
3 | 0.638 | 4.7× | 2026-09-20 |
05
44
|
3 | 0.638 | 4.7× | 2026-09-20 |
22
44
|
3 | 0.638 | 4.7× | 2026-09-20 |
05
23
|
3 | 0.638 | 4.7× | 2026-08-11 |
02
15
|
3 | 0.638 | 4.7× | 2026-09-03 |
Expected count per fixed set: D·C(N−s,k−s)/C(N,k) = 0.6378. There are 1,176 possible sets; 541 occurred at least once. Counts are distinct draws containing the whole set. With many possible sets, some will look frequent purely by chance; no multiple-comparison significance is claimed.